منابع مشابه
Behavioral agency theory: new foundations for theorizing about executive compensation
LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in furthe...
متن کاملthematization strategies, textual authenticity, and comprehensibility
the investigation would certainly offer implications for translation, where the translators mostly adhere to only the ideational meaning of the sl text neglecting its textual meaning, a practice which mostly leads to target language texts which have lower readability(compared with their source language counterparts) due to their displaced thematization strategies.
Theorizing the textual differences between authentic and fictitious reviews: Validation across positive, negative and moderate polarities
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is two-fold: (1) to build a theoretical model that identifies textual cues to distinguish between authentic and fictitious reviews, and (2) to empirically validate the theoretical model by examining reviews of positive, negative as well as moderate polarities. Design/methodology/approach: Synthesizing major theories on deceptive communication, the theoretical ...
متن کاملRe-theorizing the “Structure–Agency” Relationship: Figurational Theory, Organizational Change and the Gaelic Athletic Association
This article illustrates how the figurational sociology associated with Norbert Elias provides an alternative theoretical framework for explaining the relationship between, ‘individualorganizationsociety’ and organizational change, and in so doing transverses what is conceived as a false dichotomy between structure and agency. Through an historical case study of the Gaelic Athletic Association ...
متن کاملCollective Responsibility for Oppression
Many contemporary forms of oppression are not primarily the result of formally organized collective action nor are they an unintended outcome of a combination of individual actions. This raises the question of collective responsibility. I argue that we can only determine who is responsible for oppression if we understand oppression as a matter of social practices that create obstacles for socia...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Literature
سال: 1998
ISSN: 0002-9831
DOI: 10.2307/2902865